Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Swift

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 02:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Lee Swift

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Lee Swift (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After pruning the poorly or unsourced information in this article, we're not left with much. I can't find any coverage of Swift/Cook under either name that satisfies WP:NAUTHOR or GNG. There's no meaningful reviews of his books from any of the typical reliable sources and no coverage of his other works or him as an actor or competitor in a netflix show. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:57, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

• Comment One mention in PopSugar, which is a "mildly reliable source", coverage in Bustle, not much better as a source. Women's Health has brief coverage, mostly about his instagram account, rest aren't much help. Name search peters off after page 3 of the Google listings, hitting on anyone with his name. Leaning delete. Oaktree b (talk) 14:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 14:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.